Search for: "In Re Interest of Br"
Results 121 - 140
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 9:11 am
See, e.g., In re Gosman, 282 BR 45 (Bankr. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
Br. 75, it is clear that finding and obtaining stand-alone contraceptive coverage on the Exchanges would be a substantial barrier for many women. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:46 am
My broken record mantra: workers' compensation has three stakeholders: employer, employee and government.Everyone else is a vendor.Employees get lots of attention because, well, they're the recipients of the system. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
” Appellee’s En Banc Br. 43. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am
(Justice Carolyn Demarest’s opinion in Board of Managers v Chocolate Partners, LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50754(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014] and the Bankruptcy Court’s opinion in In re Die Fliedermaus LLC, 323 BR 101 [SDNY 2005], are good places to start for anyone interested in learning more on the subject.) [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
E. coli O157:H7 was identified for the first time at the CDC in 1975, but it was not until seven years later, in 1982, that E. coli O157:H7 was conclusively determined to be a cause of enteric disease. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
In re GPAC, 57 F.3d 1573, 1580 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Circuit held that even if the accommodation did impose a substantial burden on one or more plaintiffs' religious exercise, the government has compelling reasons for rejecting any further accommodation or exemption, and that such interests cannot be adequately advanced by any less restrictive means. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
(FDA Br. at 15.) [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
At their simplest, both Judge Henderson's 85-page dissent from the D.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
As we pointed out, the question presented is of potentially great interest, even though Athenais not a product liability case:The question presented is whether, under Buckman [Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
They think they’re doing the right thing. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
Rather, the parties ask the Court to decide whether § 215 authorizes the “creation of a historical repository of information that bulk aggregation of the metadata allows,” Appellees’ Br. 32, because bulk collection to create such a repository is “necessary to the application of certain analytic techniques,” Appellants’ Br. 23. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Federal Register Highlights The following is an alert of Environmental Federal Register announcements that may be of interest. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:02 pm
I thought it could be of interest for you. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:13 am
The season 1 finale has a very interesting plot twist. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
Weight was also placed on the US authority of In re British American Insurance Company Limited (425 BR 844 (SD Florida, 2010) which held that “operations” and “economic activity” amounted to “more than mere incorporation and record keeping”. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
This conference will examine the ways in which exclusivity on a patent can be extended for the longest term, such as re-patenting, data exclusivity, paediatric exclusivity and regulatory extensions. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
"]; Bach v Pataki, 408 F3d at 87 [New York has an "interest in monitoring gun licensees"] and 408 F3d at 91 ["(t)he State has a substantial and legitimate interest... in insuring the safety of the general public from individuals who, by their conduct, have shown themselves to be lacking the essential temperament or character which should be present in one entrusted with a dangerous instrument" [quoting In re Pelose, 5,3 AD2d 645 (2d Dept 1976)]). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Pataki, 408 F.3d at 87 [New York has an "interest in monitoring gun licensees"] and 408 F.3d at 91 ["(t)he State has a substantial and legitimate interest ... in insuring the safety of the general public from individuals who, by their conduct, have shown themselves to be lacking the essential temperament or character which should be present in one entrusted with a dangerous instrument" [quoting In re Pelose, 5,3 A.D.2d 645, 384 N.Y.S.2d 499 (2d… [read post]
