Search for: "In Re Phelps" Results 121 - 140 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Burg, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles Condemnors’ Special Considerations When Using Outside Counsel – David L. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
We find the FDA LawBlog, run by our friends at Hyman Phelps particularly informative. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
 The whole enterprise suffers if your employee or co-worker is out of the office because they’re in family court or are dealing with housing issues,” Judge Winthrop explained. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re examines the Court’s treatment, in Burwell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
“Sometimes it’s really hard to tell whether people are just genuinely confused or misinformed, or whether they’re intentionally obfuscating,” said Deven McGraw, partner in the healthcare practice of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and former director of the Health Privacy Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Amy Howe
  Other commentary focuses on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent in the case:  at Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses “inconsistency about inconsistency” in the context of the Ginsburg dissent, while at Think Progress Judd Legum reports that the dissent has “already been turned into a song. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re looks at the Court’s “unusual pro-criminal defendant summary reversal in the Double Jeopardy case” Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
In 1991, Peter Huber, discussing traumatic cancer claims, wrote: “After years of floundering in the junk science morass of traumatic cancer, judges slowly abandoned sequence-of-events logic, turned away from the sympathetic speculations of family doctors, and struggled on to the higher and firmer ground of epidemiology and medical science. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]