Search for: "In re: Daniels v." Results 121 - 140 of 1,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 11:44 am by Josh Blackman
I was pleased to attend oral argument today in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On Friday 17 March 2023, judgment on costs was handed down by Friedman J in Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd & Anor (Re Costs) [2023] EWHC 595 (Ch). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column previews next week's Supreme Court oral argument in Jack Daniel's Properties v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Gorsuch’s opinion says the Lanham Act exercises considerable care in mens rea, which is then picked up by Jack Daniels; redefining section 43 remedies. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am by Emma Snell
Daniels ruled that federal courts lacked legal jurisdiction to seize the funds. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
On 25 January 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Forensic Risk Ltd v Akisanya (KB-2022-004582). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
The post Good Batch of Recent Submissions to Journal of Free Speech Law—but We're Looking for More appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
 Au moment de son engagement, l'intéressée n'avait pas de compétence en matière de programmation informatique. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I think that Kenneth Stampp was basically correct many years ago when he said that, at least for historians, the legitimacy of secession remained an open—and perhaps unanswerable—question, a conclusion recently reaffirmed by Daniel Hamilton. [read post]