Search for: "In re Joiner" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
On re-reading Judge Shoob’s opinion, the most salient feature is the absence of any discussion of the “point estimates” of association or “effect size” in any of the studies discussed. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alexandria Women's Health Clinic (1993) (interpreting § 1985(3)'s first clause); United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Loc. 610, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm by Schachtman
  Some inferences are fatally weak or wrong; some analyses or re-analyses of data are incorrect. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:21 am by Don Asher
We’re launching this program in concert with the 10th annual National Safety Stand-Down to Prevent Falls in Construction and the industry’s Safety Week. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:52 am by Samuel Cohen
Following Venezuela’s re-election of President Nicholás Maduro, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) increased the financial pressure on Venezuela by banning the US purchase of any debts or accounts receivable owed to the government and PDVSA. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997)(questioning the external validity of a study of massive injected doses of PCBs in baby mice, with an outcome unrelated to the cancer claimed by paintiff) 1st Circuit Sutera v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
  In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liab. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
The question can be the more strongly put forth Because it is usually quite different with the U.S Supreme Court.There the practice is usually to identifyAuthor, joiner, concurrer and dissenterFrom liberals like Douglas to reactionaries like Willis Van Devanter,Or, in more modern days, Breyer or Ginsberg on the one hand,Or Scalia, Thomas or others from the right wing band.So why is it so different in the courts of appeal,Where you'd never know who's a hero, who's a heel? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am by Schachtman
  Later in the chapter, Berger does discuss a specific-causation decision by Judge Jack Weinstein, in In re Zyprexa, 2009 WL 1357236 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
Deconstructing the Deconstruction of Deconstruction Some scholars have suggested that the most searching scrutiny of scientific research takes place in the courtroom. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:41 pm
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America withdrew more than half of its pay-for-performance proposals after negotiations with companies. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
” — Max Rheinstein (1943) “[A]re we in danger of accepting him too uncritically? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]