Search for: "In re N.C" Results 121 - 140 of 1,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit: Right, but they're not in the town because of the zoning decision. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am by John Floyd
.), Sam Erwin (D-N.C.), and James Eastland (D. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
We're not saying we don't appreciate the Hamilton references strewn throughout this Fifth Circuit opinion, we're just saying we're disappointed the dissent did not challenge the majority to a rap battle. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Federal Election Commission Slapped Marathon Petroleum Corporation with a $85,000 Fine After It Illegally Contributed $1 Million to 2 Republican PACs Yahoo News – Bryan Metzger (Business Insider) | Published: 3/18/2022 The FEC levied a $85,000 fine against Marathon Petroleum Company after it illegally contributed $1 million to a pair of PACs supporting House and Senate Republicans’ re-election campaigns. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
‘The solution is to have a clean division.'” “Some institutions aren’t even debating this issue because they’re handling investigations internally—and they’re making a mess. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Warren, Thirty Years of Disappointment: North Carolina’s Remarkable Appellate Batson Record, 94 N.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
The post Roberts to Congress on court reforms: We’re on it appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:28 am by John Rubin
In re D.S., 364 N.C. 184, 193–94 (2010) (holding that noncompliance with 15-day deadline, plus 15-day extension, for filing of juvenile delinquency petition following submission of complaint did not deprive court of jurisdiction; court relies on decisions holding that a statute’s use of term “shall” for time in which to act may be directory, not mandatory). [read post]