Search for: "In re Wells (1971)"
Results 121 - 140
of 590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm
California (1971).Yesterday in the reapportionment case, Chief Justice Roberts expressed a similar sentiment on transcript page 40. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
., In re Ahlert, 424 F.2d 1088, 1091-92 (CCPA 1970); see also In re Moore, 444 F.2d 572, 574-75 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:45 am
Each segment includes the drunken narration over reenactments by well-known actors and comedians. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm
Unless you’re a regular -- or even occasional follower -- of the machinations of the nation’s Christianist Right, you may wonder what AFA is all about. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 11:12 am
They’re the “Minority” and they “don’t need your authority. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am
You're abhorrent. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 am
Because of its health risks, Agent Orange was banned in 1971. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 10:57 am
See, e.g., In re Ahlbrecht,[435 F.2d 908 (CCPA 1971)]. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
In 1971, an Astra employee synthesized metoprolol succinate as well as the tartrate and sulfate salts of metoprolol and chose to commercialize the tartrate salt product. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:05 am
In 1971, it was decided that the way to end de facto segregation was to use a neutral test that would allow any student, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity or poverty admission. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:45 am
Still, any test of the first sale doctrine online is well worth watching and this case is no exception. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
Well, it means that Led Zeppelin may still potentially utilize laches to bar the equitable injunction against the re-release of Led Zeppelin IV. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 7:00 am
Wynn, 472 S.W.2d 750, 752 (Tex. 1971)). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Editoy AG, 79 USPQ2d 1783, 1790 n.9 (TTAB 2006) (“the law is well established that an assignee stands in the shoes of its assignor”). [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:04 am
We’re not asking; we’re telling you. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:45 am
Mirrlees' classic 1971 set-up for balancing efficiency against distributional considerations in the structure of an optimal income tax expressly leaves time out. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:37 am
Upon its initial release, it was rated “X” in the United States before it being re-edited to obtain an “R” rating. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
We cannot redesign a headlight without first making sure the automobile chassis has been re-constructed to accept it. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Actually, you’re right. . . . [read post]
