Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa"
Results 121 - 140
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The defendant was sentenced in federal court on October 31, 2014, to seven years= imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $1,125,022.58.After trial Supreme Court, inter alia, found that in all respects the defendant was not credible. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The defendant was sentenced in federal court on October 31, 2014, to seven years= imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $1,125,022.58.After trial Supreme Court, inter alia, found that in all respects the defendant was not credible. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
A description of applicable federal laws and policies, and applicable state laws, including new or proposed federal or state legislation or policies5. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
Recently we discovered an insurance policy that benefitted someone other than the defendant if the person whose name the policy was in died. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
The Supreme Court has so held as to obscenity and as to unprotected commercial speech. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Washington National Insurance, No. 28 WAP 2016 (Pa. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:11 am
Thus, for 13 years, federal and state trial courts in Pennsylvania have applied the legal standard announced by the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s “preeminent ruling” in Terletsky v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Pa. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:05 am
In Sayles v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:00 am
The District Court noted the United States Supreme Court held in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:53 am
There is a large body of case law in both Pa. state and federal courts holding that mere negligence is not bad faith, and that an insurer has the legal right to be wrong on claims decisions, as long as the decision can be supported by a reasonable basis. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
The court noted that it would have to predict whether stacked UIM is available pursuant to Sackett, which the court noted was an issue before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Toner v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Corp., 891 A.2d 704 (Pa. 2005) decision, in which the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that uninsured and underinsured motorist claims may be presented in the Court of Common Pleas, “has created uncertainty on how to conduct civil actions which involve a claim on a plaintiff’s uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage as well as a claim for bad faith on the part of the insurance company. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Pa. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Pa. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
In doing so, the New Jersey Supreme Court limited application of its decision in Cooper v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Gebhard & Co., Inc., 570 Pa. 148.Leo Gustafson v Town of N. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
Federal District Court Judge Anita B. [read post]
