Search for: "JOHN DOES 1-15" Results 121 - 140 of 3,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 8:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Similarly, John Doe is a visual artist who has three O-1 visas (main job, agent, and part-time job). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:15 am by David Oscar Markus
Does it strike you as odd that the government would indict someone for crimes that would carry penalties of up to 35 years in prison and $1 million fines, and then offer them a three month prison sentence?" [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 5:02 am by Jon Gelman
New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics (075584)Does the Director of the Office of Attorney Ethics have the authority to proceed with a grievance after a District Ethics Committee Secretary (with concurrence by a designated public member) has declined a grievance, pursuant to Rule 1:20-3(e)(3)? [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
How then does all of this work practically? [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:56 am by Derek T. Muller
It does not include clerkships obtained by students after graduation; it only includes clerkships obtained by each year's graduating class.I included some schools that had only one or two year's worth of data, like the separate Penn State schools. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:26 pm by Luke Gilman
He also does a great version of Richard Thompson’s 1952 Vincent Black Lightning – check it out around 15:37 in the Poor Michael’s set below, no small feat in itself. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Ken
This morning John Steele's brief appeared on PACER. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:13 pm by Gordon Firemark
Errata (01/15/2010):  I’ve updated this post to reflect that the duration of copyright protection for works created after Jan. 1, 1978 is life+70 years, not 50 as I inadvertently stated. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966): (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the relevant art; and (4) objective evidence of nonobviousness, if present. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:24 am by John Elwood
Corcoran, 10–91, CA7, relisted 9/27, 10/8, apparently 10/15; the court called for the record on 10/1. 1. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]