Search for: "JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 121 - 140 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by John Mikhail
  Scroll down to see for yourself why the Trump Justice Department’s narrow definition of “emolument” in CREW v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 13, 2008 Cao v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Beam dissented in part: A correct evaluation of the record, in my view, compels a finding that the department’s actions would deter a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in protected political speech. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
 Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal reports that the Department will institute new procedures that will correct the error (subscription required). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Ct., Aug. 21, 2009), a Massachusetts state appeals court affirmed (with a minor modification) a lower court's holding that the Department of Corrections provide an additional Imam to perform weekly Jum'ah services and that female officers be prohibited from touching the genital or anal areas of any male Muslim inmates except in emergency situations.In Sandeford v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:27 am
Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law, Penal Law. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dryden & Ors v Johnson Matthey Plc, heard 27-28 Nov 2017. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Jillian Moss
The rule also corrects factors within the tool’s equation to improve its accuracy. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
” Finally, Roberts – joined by Thomas, Gorsuch, and Justice Samuel Alito – dissented from the court’s decision to send the case of Johnson v. [read post]