Search for: "John Doe(s) 1-17" Results 121 - 140 of 2,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Colleen Zahn's dissent: Petitioners point to sections 1, 17, and 21 in Article I as potential textual bases for an implicit fundamental right to abortion. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:25 am by Jessica Kroeze
With a letter dated 15 February 2018 the appellant-patent proprietor filed the following documents:D42: Technical declaration of Dr John BealsD43: Opinion from Dr. rer.nat. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) The government’s February 2010 cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” That’s especially true if one desideratum of a Theory is that it consist of a relatively small number of propositions—a characteristic I’ll discuss later.[5]  But even if in the physical sciences it does take a Theory to beat a Theory, it’s not clear to me that it’s true in purely normative disciplines. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am by Jay McDaniel
Under 17 USC 602 (a)(1), the importation in the United States of copies of a copyrighted that was acquired outside of the United States is an infringement of the copyright owner’s exclusive right to distribute the work. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
John Highbush: director of Reagan's library. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 10:35 am
"At The Lectern's weekly report on petitions for review notes the granting of (1) a petition filed ten days late and (2) a petition filed by a pro per. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
L’anza sued, alleging that Quality King’s actions violated its “exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
L’anza sued, alleging that Quality King’s actions violated its “exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
L’anza sued, alleging that Quality King’s actions violated its “exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
L’anza sued, alleging that Quality King’s actions violated its “exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:01 am by Michael Heise
Our randomization tests show that without such adjustments the Type 1 error soars to 44-75 percent. [read post]