Search for: "KAPLAN v. CALIFORNIA" Results 121 - 140 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  OpenAI published a paper in 2020, for example, outlining a scaling analysis for AI models, finding that “language modeling performance improves smoothly and predictably as we appropriately scale up model size, data, and compute”; see Kaplan, McCandlish, et. al, “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models,” online at:  2001.08361.pdf (arxiv.org). [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am by Eric Goldman
I’d like to thank Senator Kaplan for championing this legislation in the Senate and working collaboratively to stamp out hate wherever it is found in New York. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Columbia University)Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)Israel Ronen (London Business School)Jaffee Dwight M. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
The October edition of the Health Lawyers News, a publication of the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA), contains an article I co-authored with Jud DeLoss, a principal in the law firm of Gray Plant Mooty, who blogs at Minnesota Health IT. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3n5rvqv (Gabe Acevedo) Of ZIP Codes, Web Privacy & the Law - http://tinyurl.com/3qhbrs2 (Stephen Bennett) Risks and Rewards: The Wild West of Social Media v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
California – Tighter Rules for Lobbying Win S.F. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]