Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator"
Results 121 - 140
of 664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 11:53 am
Kelly, 256 Conn. 23, 81, 770 A.2d 908 (2001). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
; Kelly, 30 NY3d at 678; Lichtenstein, 57 NY2d at 1012; see also Matter of Picciurro v Board of Trustees of the N.Y. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
; Kelly, 30 NY3d at 678; Lichtenstein, 57 NY2d at 1012; see also Matter of Picciurro v Board of Trustees of the N.Y. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:23 pm
Standard of review of a Section 75 decisionPryor v O'Donnell, App. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:48 pm
The Court also rejected Chief Justice Kelly’s proposed amendment to the rule by a 5-2 vote with Chief Justice Kelly and Justice Cavanagh in dissent. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
Justice Kelly's dissent: Justice Kelly wrote a well-reasoned dissent. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
Kelly [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Justices Marilyn Kelly and Hathaway would grant leave to appeal in Verbrugghe v Select Specialty Hospital-Macomb County, Inc., No. 142458. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Indeed, as the Appellate Division held in Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, if an individual has been found guilty of criminal conduct in a criminal trial, a disciplinary hearing panel cannot find the individual not guilty of the same offense[s] in a subsequent administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:56 am
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 700, July 10, 2020, Kelly, J.). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 1:39 am
Clark, 559 So.2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); see also Sean Kelly & Shane Kelly, Litigation Under the Florida Probate Code § 1.29 (6th ed. 2006) (“Generally, in a probate administration, the personal representative is the only person over whom the court has in personam jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:21 am
In Kelly v Levin, 440 NYS2d 424, the court ruled that is a reversible error for an administrative disciplinary tribunal to acquit an employee if the individual has been found guilty of a criminal act involving the same allegations. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Our review of the determination, which adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who conducted the public hearing, " 'is limited to consideration of whether substantial evidence supports the agency determination' " (Matter of Scheuneman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 147 AD3d 1523, 1524 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Rainer N. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Our review of the determination, which adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who conducted the public hearing, " 'is limited to consideration of whether substantial evidence supports the agency determination' " (Matter of Scheuneman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 147 AD3d 1523, 1524 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Rainer N. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:18 am
They are located on p. 7 of the PDF version of CCR v. 2, beginning on line 46. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit, in a per curiam opinion, affirmed in part a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's revised travel ban issued by a federal district court in Hawaii v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, [decided with Elliott v City of New York], said that: 1.The courts may not modify such a determination if substantial evidence supports it; and 2.A court must uphold an administrative penalty unless it finds that it is so… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:56 am
Judge Stallman, after commenting that Rivera failed to demonstrate the relevance of the Certificate insofar as this case was concerned, indicated that even if it were relevant, such a certificate does not exempt a civil servant from administrative discipline.As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v… [read post]
