Search for: "Kent v. USA"
Results 121 - 140
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that “[w]henever the Supreme Court makes a significant change in the law — as it did last week when it overruled its prior approval of nonunanimous juries in state criminal cases” in Ramos v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger predicts that the Court will deny certiorari in Maples v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am
” Joan Biskupic echoes this sentiment in USA Today, explaining that the majority’s distinction narrows the interpretation of the 1968 precedent, Flast v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
At ACSblog, Jody Kent (director of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth) and Beth Colgan (an attorney at the Institutions Project at Columbia Legal Services) praise last week’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
, 644 S.W.2d 705, 706 (Tex. 1982); Houston Omni USA Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
Lyle Denniston covered the order for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger discusses the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
” At Law360 (subscription or registration required), Jason Steed discusses the Court’s recent decision in Harris v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
He attended a college of design and communications in Kent and converted to Islam when he was 21 and it is contended that he subsequently descended into Islamic extremism and travelled to Yemen (December 2010 – July 2011). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Mazars USA — which involved congressional subpoenas — is a “mixed decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Panetti v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
One of the term’s major cases was Janus v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the output from Friday’s conference. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
