Search for: "LUNG v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm
Estate of Morris Blackburn (10th Cir., May 23, 2017) (affirming Black Lung Benefits compensation claim and denying petition for review: the Labor Benefits Review Board did not err in affirming the award below)*Hays v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:39 am
Following the opinion in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Engle v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Ultimately, this failure to diagnose her lung cancer resulted in her death in 2017, according to her adult children’s position in Santiago v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Ultimately, this failure to diagnose her lung cancer resulted in her death in 2017, according to her adult children’s position in Santiago v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:32 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:46 am
<> American Lung Association v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:38 am
State, Vernier v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 4:45 am
Though this account of Roe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 12:02 pm
The respondent in Huscoal, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
On January 11, 1964, the Office of the Surgeon General, in the United States, issued a Committee report that reviewed the available evidence and concluded that the relationship between smoking and lung cancer was indeed causal. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
The case, EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
Most states, however, including California, impose criminal liability on a person aiding and abetting suicide. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Before 1965, legal doctrine and state and federal regulatory regimes saw the occupational lung disease problem as one of employers’ management of the workplace, and employer and employee compliance with regulations.[1] Before the Restatement (Second) of Torts in 1965, cases against remote industrial suppliers were quite uncommon. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:02 am
"] From Judge Cabranes's concurrence yesterday in Vengalattore v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
Staubley v. [read post]