Search for: "Labor v. Social Security Administration" Results 121 - 140 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am by Bernard Bell
At an April 9, 2017 meeting of the Council, Glen Merrill, NMFS Assistant Regional Administrator for the Alaska Region, unsuccessfully sought Council approval to mandate consideration of increased labor costs. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
The Trump Administration lost another round in its battle in Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer works with U.S. and foreign businesses, governments, trade associations, and others on workforce, social security and severance, health care, immigration, privacy and data security, tax, ethics and other laws and regulations. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
He was not laid off in 2005, and in late 2004 or early 2005, the employee received a letter from the Social Security Administration stating that his name and SSN did not match its records. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm by Cicely Wilson
Co., US 1st Cir. (1/17/13)ERISA, Government & Administrative Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiff was a partner in a medical practice where she served as a staff anesthesiologist. [read post]
Average monthly Social Security retirement payment: $1,306 a month for individuals and $2,140 for couples Maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security taxation: $116,500. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 It wants to take corrective steps to mitigate any fines ICE might impose. #2:  An employer receives a Social Security Administration letter (a no-match notice) announcing that the  employer's payroll tax contributions tied to particular employees' social security numbers (SSNs) contain information that conflicts with the SSA's own records associated with the earmarked SSNs. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am by Shahid Buttar
EFF cited that decision 55 years later, when we filed First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer works with U.S. and foreign businesses, governments, trade associations, and others on workforce, social security and severance, health care, immigration, privacy and data security, tax, ethics and other laws and regulations. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Resolving conflicting medical evidence submitted in connection with a Workers’ Compensation Law claim is within the exclusive province of the Workers’ Compensation Board Granville v Town of Hamburg; 2016 NY Slip Op 01373, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Town of Hamburg had employed Patrick Granville as a laborer and light equipment operator from 2003 to 2012. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm by Michael Lowe
It can include forging checks, taking someone else’s retirement or Social Security benefits, or using a person’s credit cards and bank accounts without their permission. [read post]