Search for: "Latham v. Latham"
Results 121 - 140
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Rebekka holds a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the Bonn University.Sven Völcker (Partner, Latham & Watkins):Dr Sven Völcker is a partner in Latham & Watkins' Global Antitrust & Competition Practice. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
”Working with NITA’s fictitious “Homestead Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
She worked as an associate at Latham & Watkins LLP in San Diego starting in 1997 and became an equity partner in 2006. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:13 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Sharikov v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:35 am
The group recommended the Supreme Court’s definition of materiality outlined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
January 10th: SEC’s New Whistleblower Bounty Program - Richard Owens of Latham & Watkins and Linda Chatman Thomsen of Davis Polk & Wardwell will discuss the new regulation and how it may likely affect capital market participants, including the likely final provisions of the regulation, who will and who will not qualify for “whistleblower” status, what constitutes “original information,” the size of the “bounties” and much more. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
Sue Reisinger with Corporate Counsel wrotethis September 1, 2012 article on Eaton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:59 am
“Whether the complaint will later survive a motion for summary judgment, or whether the plaintiff will ultimately be able to prove its claims, of course, plays no part in the determination of a prediscovery CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss” (Churong Liu v Gabbay, 219 AD3d 459, 460 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Maursky v Latham, 219 AD3d 473, 474-475). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
” — (Von Kaenel v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:18 am
Gregory Latham, also known as Kevin O'Sullivan, Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
The Daily Texan reports that the University of Texas has hired the firm of Latham & Watkins to represent the University in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
See Friese v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:44 pm
Latham, Demi S. [read post]
