Search for: "Lindsey v Lindsey" Results 121 - 140 of 570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said any committee member will be free to participate in the Barrett hearing remotely. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:44 am by John Jascob
For example, the Court will again face the question of the boundaries of disgorgement in Jalbert v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm by CAFE
Lindsey Graham tweets, 9/19/20 VIDEO: Sen. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:21 am by Scott Bomboy
In a recent Congressional Research Service report, the CRS cites the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) reportedly applauded the settlement and said that if the federal government does not meet its commitment by 2037, “I don’t know if I’ll be around. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:17 pm by David Oscar Markus
The Court found that “[w]hen we read Article V, section 8 together with article V, section 11, the only reasonable conclusion is that the Bar eligibility requirement attaches at the time of appointment. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:34 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
NMCCA has an unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Accordingly, I look forward to their condemnations of the Graham investigation--and to Bill Barr and the SG raising constitutional objections to any subpoenas that Lindsey Graham issues to current and former government officials.P.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 10:47 pm
*Judge Norma Lindsey - (County Court 2006 - Jeb Bush; Circuit Court 2011 - Rick Scott; 3rd DCA 2017 - Rick Scott). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
Lindsey Graham characterized the House as “blow[ing] through these privileges” and insisted he would not “destroy the privilege” by seeking testimony. [read post]