Search for: "Look v. Amaral" Results 121 - 140 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am by Nabiha Syed
  Briefly:   At Verdict, Vikram David Amar examines the issues in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  For starters, the California Supreme Court’s review here is discretionary, not mandatory, and I expect the Justices will look for plausible, prudential reasons to stay out of, rather than excuses to jump into, a situation in which the Proposition 8 likely no longer reflects the desires of the California electorate. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have offered a variety of reasons for their wariness to look into motive. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on  Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Supreme Court’s decision to reverse the lower court looks correct as to result, even if poorly executed as a matter of judicial craft.What was the federal claim on which the district court granted the relief in question? [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:52 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" One might disagree about which disuniformity is worse, but this is what the argument should be about.A similar issue came up in the patent law context this spring in Abraxis BioScience v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Geof and Erwin began by laying out many areas of agreement among courts and scholars who have looked at free speech flare-ups on public university campuses over the past several decades. [read post]