Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 2:02 am
Borrower’s informed consent necessary Hurstanger Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:55 am
Applicant free not to pursue appeal to House of Lords Regina (Jones) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Lord Justice Arnold) Sky Ltd and others v Skykick UK Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1735 (Ch) (2 July 2020) On 9 May 2020, I wrote in Trade marks - Sky v Skykick, The Final Chapter: "Thus endeth a lawsuit that required three hearings before Lord Justice Arnold as he now is, one to the Court of Appeal and another to the CJEU. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
Chartbrook Ltd and Another v Persimmon Homes Ltd and Another House of Lords “There were no grounds for the House of Lords to depart from the long standing rule that excluded evidence of what was said or done during the course of negotiating a contract for the purpose of drawing inferences about what the contract meant. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 1:53 am
In a decision reminiscent of Lord Mansfield’s rule, the Second District yesterday overturned a finding that a putative biological father had standing to challenge the paternity of a child born to married parents who both objected, in J.S. and C.L. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:42 pm
On the 18th June the House of Lords handed down their opinions IN THE CAUSE R v Davies (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) I quote from the speech of Lord Bingham, the senior law lord at paragraph 5 : It is a long-established principle of the English common law that, subject to certain exceptions and statutory qualifications, the defendant in a criminal trial should be confronted by his accusers in order that he may cross-examine… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
Relying in particular on the views of Lord Fraser of Tullybelton in G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647 Lord Reed concluded: “The question, therefore, is whether the court below went wrong. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
KS v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1756 (23 July 2010) – Read judgment J, S, M v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 – Read judgment The Lord Chief Justice has emphasised in two Court of Appeal judgments that the jury-less trials must be a last resort and take place only in truly extreme cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE House of Lords “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State for the Home Department wanted to rely on closed material in a terror-suspect hearing to justify his decision to make a control order, the controlled person [...] [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
My Lord, we couldn’t agree more. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
curid=97243730 Jane LambertSupreme Court (Lords Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Leggatt, Stephens and Richards) Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Ahmed and Another [2024] UKSC 17 (15 May 2024 [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
If the Court finds that the Lord Ordinary did not make any error in law then no further consideration to the appellant’s grounds of appeal is necessary. 1211: Gerry Moynihan QC stating he has nothing to add to The Lord Advocate’s submissions. 1203: The Lord Advocate submits there has been no error by the Lord Ordinary in the Outer House or in the Inner House and that the Appeal should be refused. 1200: On a hypothetical basis, in response to Mr… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am
One of his judgments which garnered media attention and criticism from the (then) Home Secretary – Michael Howard- was the case of R v Home Secretary ex p Norney [1995] QBD 6 Oct. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:01 am
We commented last week on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Flood v Times Newspapers ([2012] UKSC 11). [read post]
News: Supreme Court will give judgment in privacy injunction case of PJS v News Group on 19 May 2016
16 May 2016, 5:25 am
The UK Supreme Court has announced that it will hand down judgment in the case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Limited at 9.30am on Thursday 19 May 2016. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:35 pm
England's highest court, the House of Lords has just issued a decision about without prejudice communications, which is seen as bolstering the protections given to those communications. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
Lord Carnwath’s interpretation of the Strasbourg jurisprudence did not support a general view that appellant’s oral evidence is a necessary part of an “effective” appeal in the sense contemplated by De Souza Ribeiro (which was interpreted restrictively in IR v UK [2014] ECHR 340). [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 7:15 pm
Author: Peters Hans/ArnefoLicence Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 NetherlandsSource Wikipedia Ice Dance Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Kitchin, Lord Justices Floyd and Longmore) Icescape Ltd v Ice-World International BV and Another : [2018] EWCA Civ 2219 The importance of this case is that it interprets, applies and possibly extends the Supreme Court's [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:31 am
Lord Justice Arnold [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
