Search for: "M.S. v M.S." Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
The European Journal of Public Health. 2015;26(2):354-359.[7] Subramaniyan R, Veliah G, Gopichandran V. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
The European Journal of Public Health. 2015;26(2):354-359.[7] Subramaniyan R, Veliah G, Gopichandran V. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Krishnan Nair, writing for Mulberry Finch, comments on this case here, considering it to be a blow struck for correct process in these types of cases, where special attention must be paid to children who are UK citizens Kizhakudan v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 566 Foreign student whose college lost licence wins appeal for leave to remain (and find alternate sponsorship at another college) as the judge in the first-tier tribunal failed to consider his human right… [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While whether and how much of the $100 per day penalty authorized in Section 502(c) penalties is discretionary with the courts, the more than $500,000 Section 502(c) penalty awarded in M.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
A close analysis of five decisions is crucial for this exercise – the oft-quoted judgment of the Supreme Court in VB Rangaraj v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
(M.S.) 2013 ABPC)Taking pictures up a female’s skirt (R v Rocha 2012 ABPC)Recording a roommate and the roommate’s girlfriend having sex (R v Pan 2012 ABPC)Making videos of sexual activity between accused and accused’s partner without consent, posting the videos on Facebook, and sending links of the video to friends (R v Desilva 2011 ONCJ)What is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy? [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee            In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]