Search for: "MATTER OF LEE v. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Substantively, there are only a couple of questions that really matter about the precedential implications of this ruling: 1) Will more 512(f) plaintiffs succeed in court? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:40 pm by Anthony McCain
Kinzie Manufacturing Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP Design IP Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP Upcoming Events Stout Risius Ross 2nd Annual Intellectual Property Symposium [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Smith of Jenner & Block, who argued and won Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
  * Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Randy Smith, accused the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable" but the majority held that "An actor's performance, when fixed, is copyrightable if it evinces 'some minimal degree of creativity ... no matter how crude, humble or obvious it might be". [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
Lee Bailey’s just released Excellence in Cross-Examination. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
           The reality of the most notorious virtual currency is that it is only a matter of time before it comes under the purview of a regulatory body. [read post]