Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION" Results 121 - 140 of 1,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by Craig Kelley
Multiple offenses by one driver could mean their disqualification from operating a commercial motor vehicle. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:09 am by Roy Simon
  The new provision, which took effect on March 1, 2010, states as follows: Compensatory Grading --SULC (e) If a lawyer or law student affiliated both with a law school legal clinic and with one or more lawyers outside the clinic is required to decline representation of any client solely by virtue of this Rule 1.10, this rule imposes no disqualification on any other lawyer or law student who would otherwise be disqualified solely by reason of an… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm by PaulKostro
Furthermore, [i]f that burden of production or of going-forward is met, the burden shifts to the attorneys sought to be disqualified to demonstrate that the matter or matters in which he or they represented the former client are not the same or substantially related to the controversy in which the disqualification motion is brought. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:52 am by admin
  Unless this is properly navigated, these conflicts can result in a breach of duty to clients, attorney discipline and/or disqualification from a matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:37 pm by David Feldman
In the past, one exemption, Rule 505, included bad actor disqualification. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:08 am by David Lynn
" In fact, the free writing prospectus is now pretty much the only place where a credit rating can be disclosed in a securities offering, because Dodd-Frank's repeal of Rule 436(g), as a practical matter, prevents the disclosure of credit ratings in a prospectus (or report incorporated by reference into a prospectus) for the purpose of offering the security. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” “In its motion to disqualify Ropes & Gray, Centripetal Networks alleged it was either ‘a former client’ based on an ‘implied attorney-client relationship’ theory under Rules 1.7 and 1.9 or ‘a third person’ to whom the Ropes & Gray attorneys would owe responsibilities under Rule 1.7. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:32 am
The TTAB, under authority delegated by the USPTO Director, decides petitions for disqualification of counsel. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:49 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If not, then the Court's Trump-friendly ruling yes [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:34 am by Dan Bressler
Initially, Keel had represented Watts in two matters arising out of the accident. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:32 pm
  The case offered no definitive answer, but the court noted the complexities that arose because California’s rules on this point (imputed disqualification) arguably differed from the Model Rules. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:46 am by Dan Bressler
The judge disagreed, saying that waiver only applies in matters when Hartford is not involved as a party. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Anderson; for more on the amici, see the end of the post: Amici often do not see eye to eye on matters of law or policy. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:54 am by Rosalind English
The Bulgarian Court of Appeal referred to the CJEU a question for a preliminary ruling arising out of a dispute over penalty points which triggered automatic disqualification from driving under Bulgarian law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Paula Mallery wanted to be sure she had safely left her estate to her friend, Ron Stanton, and a moderate estate at that, without her family interceding and dragging the matter into the probate court following her death. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:40 am by Legal Profession Prof
The malpractice case involves issues with a real estate matter Altman, on behalf of Fine Housing, brought a legal malpractice... [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:39 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Rule 166 (sans 'a') deals with another pre-trial matter: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 1:28 pm by Beth Graham
The AAA impartiality rule conflicts with the parties’ agreement because the parties spoke on the matter and did not choose impartiality. [read post]