Search for: "Macy v. Macy"
Results 121 - 140
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2009, 3:34 am
" Gilmore v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Macy’s, Inc., 2013 WL 5827729 (6th Cir. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
In Iskanian v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Alviar v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm
In its Macy v Holder decision, the commission stated that “intentional discrimination against a transgender individual because that person is transgender is, by definition, discrimination ‘based on …sex,’ and such discrimination therefore violates Title VII. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Alviar v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:04 pm
But, for auto loans, and store credit cards, such as Macy's or Sears cards, the statute of limitations is four years. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:59 pm
Macy v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:37 am
The opinion also explains that Macy’s computer records showed that nine boys' Polo shirts and three men's Polo shirts were marked down by [Wells]. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Other notable items for Acting Chair Lipnic include: She was part of the EEOC’s unanimous 2012 decision in Macy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 8:44 am
See, e.g., Macy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Other notable items for Acting Chair Lipnic include: She was part of the EEOC’s unanimous 2012 decision in Macy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:10 pm
--Dorward v Macy’s Inc, MDFla, July 20, 2011: An employer’s alleged breach of an employment contract containing an arbitration agreement did not foreclose enforcing arbitration against an employee, ruled a federal district court in Florida, in spite of her laundry list of reasons for why she should not be compelled to arbitrate her Title VII claims. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
Macy's. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
Corp., 354 F.3d 1020, 1035 (9th Cir.2004) (Berzon, J., concurring): If I went to Macy’s website and did a search for a Calvin Klein shirt, would Macy’s violate Calvin Klein’s trademark if it responded (as does Amazon.com, for example) with the requested shirt and pictures of other shirts I might like to consider as well? [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:46 am
In last year’s much publicized Macy v Holder decision, the EEOC — following earlier court precedents which held that Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based on “sex” extends to claims for sex stereotyping, as well any other claim asserting that gender was taken into account — ruled that transgender workers are protected under Title VII. [read post]
