Search for: "Main v. Vermont Supreme Court" Results 121 - 140 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California, North Dakota and Maine explicitly prohibit compensation for delivering a ballot on behalf of a voter. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:08 am
Same-sex marriage was on the national agenda since the early 1990s (partly as a result of state court decisions in Hawaii and Vermont) and it has gained momentum in recent years as a result of a mix of judicial decisions (Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
”  Id. at 585-86.ArkansasThe Arkansas Supreme Court avoided the issue in Adams v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Supreme Court held that punishing a criminal by stripping them of their citizenship was unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
The Vermont Supreme Court has made it clear that direction and control will exist where the employer has the "right" to provide direction and control, regardless of whether such direction and control is actually exercised. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm by Robin Wilson
  The Court concluded that the statute violated the Establishment Clause, citing Lemon v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am by Lyle Denniston
  The majority relied heavily upon a 1996 Supreme Court decision, Romer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
  The AmeriKat summarizes the main questions and responses as follows:1. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
" With sections 164 and 169 in mind, Sierra Club pieced together its argument using (1) the Supreme Court's ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Just as importantly, perhaps, states perturbed by the undoubtedly correct decision by the Supreme Court in Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
The Delaware Supreme Court refused to permit an asbestos-related medical monitoring claim in Mergenthaler v. [read post]