Search for: "Mann v Does" Results 121 - 140 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
  The appeal was allowed, resulting in the judgment of Mann J on finding the patent to be invalid being overturned. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 pm by Matthew Bush
The petition of the day is: Mann v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mann, 2014 BCCA 231 (CanLII), 310 C.C.C. (3d) 143. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
In particular, does the fact that so much electronic evidence outside the scope of a warrant can come into "plain view" during a computer search require a different approach to whether that evidence outside the scope of the warrant should be admitted? [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In this action for legal malpractice, plaintiff alleges that defendants’ mishandling of her defense in a Family Court proceeding brought against her by nonparty John Doe resulted in her settling a separate civil action and other disputes with Doe on unfavorable terms. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on the same day there was a CMC in the case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd before Mann J. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Fran Unsworth told Mr Justice Mann at a High Court trial in London that the BBC had a responsibility to report but also to be sensitive. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
After considering a number of authorities, the Judge concluded that “the case law does not bind me to take either a wrapped up approach, or a divided up approach. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Additionally, with regard to strategic decisions “the selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]). [read post]