Search for: "Mark Hoffmann"
Results 121 - 140
of 196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
Hoffmann at (314) 361-4300. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
No…On the question of the implied term, HHJ Hacon found Lord Hoffmann’s comments in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10(a judgment of the Board of the Privy Council) instructive. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Consult with The Hoffmann Law Firm, L.L.C. at (314) 361-4242 for a free consultation. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:06 am
It does so on terms that are perhaps more familiar to trade mark lawyers than to practitioners of copyright – van Meegeren, like van Gogh, has become a brand name in his own right, and, apparently, a highly saleable one. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm
Lord Hoffmann. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
Cir. 2009) and In re Hoffmann-La Roche, 587 F.3d 1333 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We watched some of the recently concluded Winter Olympics. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:22 am
Once upon a time there was the Newspaper Licensing Agency, a relatively stuffy and generally unloved body that was seen by many users of copyright-protected materials as an infernal nuisance and as a meddlesome, bungling litigant, as in the notorious case of Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited v Marks and Spencer Plc, resolved by a powerful speech of Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords back in 2001 [this case is worth reading for the facts alone: here is a 21st century ruling on use… [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
Hoffmann - La Roche Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1122 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., 2013 WL 1191899 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Article 5 is subject to Article 7 which provides that a trade mark owner is not entitled to prohibit the use of the trade mark, including importation, in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that mark by the trade mark owner or with his consent, i.e. where the trade mark owner's rights are exhausted. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Thomas Koch of Hoffmann Eitle, noted. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:38 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. for participating in a conspiracy in the vitamins industry. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
The small claims PCC track will deal with unregistered Community and UK design rights, copyright, database rights and trade marks (what about passing off?). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
The small claims PCC track will deal with unregistered Community and UK design rights, copyright, database rights and trade marks (what about passing off?). [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Virgin's secondary case was that the requirement of the triangular passenger support element was met by the rear console located beneath the headrest (marked yellow in the figure to the right). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
But that's not how we construe the scope of protection of registered trade marks, is it? [read post]
