Search for: "Marshall v. Holmes" Results 121 - 140 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence Solum
First, it is demonstrated that uncited dissents by Joseph Bradley in the Slaughter-House Cases and by Oliver Wendell Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:53 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Indeed,  John Marshall may be the only one who fits more than one, though you could also put Holmes, Brandeis, and Scalia in that set. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Johnson, invalidating a prosecution for flag burning was:Majority: Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, KennedyDissent: Rehnquist, White, Stevens, O'Connor And by now, just about everybody accepts Texas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Sean Wajert
But one of the most famous dissents in legal history was by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I wanted another WR and it was either Breaston, Braylon Edwards or Santonio Holmes. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
Past winners include Chief Justice Burger and Justices Frankfurter, Holmes, Powell, Marshall, Brennan, O’Connor, and Kennedy. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Many great judicial legacies have a deep theoretical foundation—Oliver Wendell Holmes’s skeptical pragmatism, William J. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
 Only Justice Holmes served on the Court at a greater age. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
Cardozo, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who all lacked federal judicial experience but who had served with distinction on the highest courts of New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm by cdw
”  [via FindLaw] Marshall Lee Gore v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Many great judicial legacies have a deep theoretical foundation—Oliver Wendell Holmes’s skeptical pragmatism, William J. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:40 am by Tim Von Dulm
 Have you ever wanted to read the actual appellant’s brief submitted by Thurgood Marshall in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:05 pm by Brian Tamanaha
By almost all accounts, Bush v. [read post]