Search for: "Masse v. City of Providence" Results 121 - 140 of 884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 11:54 am
The Critical Mass example shows that the opportunity and power of people to videotape the events they witness provides additional evidence to use in determining what happened and whether a constitutional violation has occurred. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 2:33 pm by Sever | Storey
Private developments – Since the 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
Article 89 of the 1954 Constitution provides that: “Freedom of the person of citizens of the People’s Republic of China is inviolable. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Frank Cranmer
Though it had gathered signatures and submitted a petition to the Pamplona City Council to cancel the exhibition, when the Council refused to do so, it did not challenge that decision by bringing contentious administrative proceedings as provided for in the Spanish legal system [28]. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Ishaan Tharoor provides analysis for the Washington Post. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Ken Feinberg, speaking at a symposium on mass torts, asks what legal challenges do mass torts confront in the federal courts. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:39 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 196 F.R.D. 362, 366 (N.D.Cal. 2000) (same). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Druid City Hospital Board, 459 So.2d 818, 822-23 (Ala. 1984), which uniquely held that a hospital could be liable as a “seller” of a product under an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose theory. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm by Camille Fischer
How would the Framers view mass data collection by the government—for example, copying or viewing all Internet activity routed through a service provider? [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
City of New London, the District Court determined a reasonable juror could not conclude removal of blight and construction of 2,250 new units of affordable housing were mere pretexts. [read post]