Search for: "Matter of Brown v Evans" Results 121 - 140 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Andrew Koppelman
The Equal Protection Clause is the reason the Court has struck down laws that impose certain inequalities, such as the race discrimination that was challenged in Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by Andrew Koppelman
The Equal Protection Clause is the reason the Court has struck down laws that impose certain inequalities, such as the race discrimination that was challenged in Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
Cover Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ by Daniel Goleman A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
Administration for International Development that Contreras helped move to a settlement in the late 1990s, Evans et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Cover Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ by Daniel Goleman A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Cover Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ by Daniel Goleman A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that Mayer Brown colleagues Evan Tager, David Gossett, and Brian Willen filed an amicus brief in this case on the plaintiffs’ side, but I wasn’t involved with the brief, and didn’t even know of it until shortly after the panel opinion. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Molly DiBianca
[H/T to Evan Brown at Internet Cases] See also, Blog Post as Trial Evidence [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]