Search for: "Matter of Fall v City of New York" Results 121 - 140 of 844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 4:51 am
The party alleging that an individual has changed his domicile has the burden of proving such a change of the individual’s “permanent place of abode” Matter of Gigliotti v Bianco, 2011 NY Slip Op 02206, Appellate Division, Fourth Department The City of Niagara Falls School District terminated the employment of Vincent F. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you sue municipalities for a living, you are aware of the Notice of Claim requirements in New York. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am by Jeremy Saland
In part, this is likely why District Attorney’s Offices in New York City and elsewhere take a hard stance against gravity knife and other weapon crimes in violation of Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, New York Penal Law 265.01. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am by Jeremy Saland
In part, this is likely why District Attorney’s Offices in New York City and elsewhere take a hard stance against gravity knife and other weapon crimes in violation of Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, New York Penal Law 265.01. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" In City of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Assn., Local 854, IAFF, AFL-CIO, 95 NY2d 273, the Court of Appeals held that "the subject matter of the dispute controls the analysis" and "a pending administrative proceeding concerning [a] respondent's alleged improper practices does not preclude arbitration inasmuch as there is no indication that the 'particular subject matter of the dispute' is not… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York City Criminal Attorney can assist with any matter associated with possession of a controlled substance. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved [lawprofessors.typepad.com]I bring Matter of City of Utica v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Other New York decisions dismissing tortious interference claims against the press are in accord (see, e.g., Huggins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
” However, in 2005 the New York City Council passed the Restoration Act, which amended the NYCHRL and created “two new rules of construction. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:49 pm
Cardozo of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York will argue the case on behalf of respondent. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:45 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Insurance Law Insurer Has No Duty to Indemnify; Court Finds Underlying Claims Fall Within Policy Exclusions American Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Bartlett disagreed with the argument advanced by the appointing authority, annulling the appointing authority’s' decision and remanding the matter for “a new hearing and determination de novo in compliance with New York law Judiciary Law §5. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
Consequently, it is incumbent upon the moving party to make a prima facie showing that he is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law (CPLR 3212 [b];Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980];Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 [1979]);Zarr v Riccio, 180 AD2d 734, 735 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 8:55 am by Susan Brenner
Kozlow, 8 N.Y.3d 554, 870 N.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of New York 2007) (quoting People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:10 am by Ezra Rosser
I contemplate New York Court of Appeals’ 2010 Matter of Kaur v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:07 am
D&O COVERAGE - CLAIMS-MADE POLICY - WHAT CONSTITUTES A "CLAIM"Yale Club of New York City, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is D&D Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Moreover, the fact that Printz involved gun control (at a time when many of the members of its majority were beginning to think that the Second Amendment ought to be read more forcefully) complicates matters; it is possible that some people who believe Printz was correctly decided might create an exception for immigration or national security matters. [read post]