Search for: "Matter of Levy v State of New York"
Results 121 - 140
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
[7] See also Levi Strauss Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
(see New York v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
** Citing Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, the Appellate Division observed that "Even where an arbitrator has made an error of law or fact, courts generally may not disturb the arbitrator's decision".The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00340.htm [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
After the steamboat’s invention, Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston gained an exclusive right from New York State to issue permits to steamboats in Hudson Bay. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Bobby reminded us of a speech given by former Attorney General Edward Levi in New York City in 1975, on the tension between secrecy and transparency. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Opponents of the law say that immigration is a Federal matter and the States are preempted from acting upon it. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Dooley's scholarly work has focused on procedure, both civil and criminal, and her work has appeared in such journals as the New York University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, and the University of Illinois Law Review. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al.,07 MDL 1902 (JSR)Applies To:08 Civ. 3065, 08 Civ. 3086; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
It's a process which involves both the Housing Part of the Civil Court and the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD). [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
What is very noticeable about Ohio’s political false statement statute is that it embraces and requires a standard of falsity that parallels the Constitutional standard set forth in New York Times v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:19 pm
The first is that, if the infamous 1895 Supreme Court case, Pollock v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
New York also has one of the highest state cigarette taxes ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack), yielding a combined rate of $5.85 per pack. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Examples of trademark experts with this view include professors Rebecca Tushnet and Jennifer Rothman; attorneys Megan Bannigan, David Bernstein, Timothy Cuffman, and Jon Jekel; and news reporters from the New York Times (Adam Liptak) and Bloomberg (Greg Stohr). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
