Search for: "Matter of Linn"
Results 121 - 140
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 7:40 pm
"The invention is not the language of the [claim] but the subject matter thereby defined. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
Cir. 2011)(Linn, J.); Stamps.com Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:37 pm
As the '325 patent is therefore invalid for anticipation as a matter of law. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
Amazon (CAFC 2010-1502, -1545) precedential; Judges Lourie, Linn (author), Dyk Cordance accused Amazon's "1-Click®" ("1-Click") purchasing features of infringing claims 1-3, 5, and 7-9 of the '710 Patent. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:10 am
But that did not matter to school officials, as student after student was treated with suspicion and as if they had broken the law. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm
But that did not matter to school officials, as student after student was treated with suspicion and as if they had broken the law. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
At the CAFC, Judges Linn and Gajarsa illicitly ran over the claims. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
Dyk's take rendered Rader and Linn as rubes. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:33 pm
§ 102(b) as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
Linn, 563 A.2d 123, 125 (Pa. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:06 am
An argument can also be made that it doesn’t matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
§ 290) and many plaintiffs are giving the government notice as a matter of routine practice. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Starmark Laboratories (CAFC 2010-1445) precedential; Judges Radar, Clevenger, and Linn (author) Both the '373 and '273 Patents relate to innovations in dietary supplements and food products. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
Klein (CAFC 2010-1411) Judges Newman, Schall (author), and Linn Under the Patent Act, "[a] patent may not be obtained . . . if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:46 am
the subject matter of the deception must be “material” and 4. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:59 am
The court should defer to its expertise in this matter. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Id. at 1312-25 (Linn, J., dissenting). [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:39 pm
As an initial matter, this court is not bound by the definition of materiality in PTO rules. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
The two cases cover the same subject matter. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
In re Huai-Hung Kao et al; In re Harry Ahdieh (CAFC 2010-1307, 2010-1308, 2010-1309) precedential; Judges Radar, Linn (author), Moore 11/680,432 lived to see another day. [read post]
