Search for: "Matter of Martin B." Results 121 - 140 of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 9:44 am
Editor’s Note Rose Parfitt, The Spectre of Sources Stefan B. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:15 am
Kelly NEW YORK COUNTY Trusts and Estates Children Conceived by In Vitro Found Grantor's 'Issue'; Trusts' Intent Includes Bloodline Members Matter of Martin B. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Dissenting, Judge Martin said the plain text of USERRA Sec. 4302(b) was not ambiguous and did not require “a more reasonable reading of the statute. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:12 pm
Martin George does not think he is lucky to be poked by Charon on Facebook - and now that I know what ‘poking on Facebook’ means, I can well understand his concern. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:02 am by Neoshia Roemer
Please see the relevant documents below. 156 6-7-18 Minute Order re Show Cause 159 6-29-18 Plaintiffs’ Brief re Show Cause Order 160-1 6-29-18 Exhibit A Letter from PDAS John Tahsuda to Roswell Cline 160-2 6-29-18 Exhibit B Letter from WSBA re Connie Sue Martin 161 7-3-18 Response of Kelly Defendants to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 164 7-13-18 Defendant Chief Judge Raymond G Dodge Jr’s Response to Order to Show Cause… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““The doctrine of the ‘law of the case’ is a rule of practice, an articulation of sound policy that, when an issue is once judicially determined, that should be the end of the matter as far as Judges and courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction are concerned” (Erickson v Cross Ready Mix, Inc., 98 AD3d 717, 717 [2d Dept 2012]; Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 [1975]). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:22 am by Charles Sartain
The Moore’s acquired a 1/32nd NPRI in Martin County, Texas, in 1931, but from 2009 to 2012 failed to pay ad valorem taxes. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Lockheed Martin Corp., 431 F.3d 966, 971 (6th Cir. 2005) which held that “[o]nly a complaint that complies with Rule 9(b) can have preemptive effect under [31 U.S.C]. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ortiz asked the CAAF to review the matter, challenging the qualification of one of its members, Colonel Martin Mitchell, to serve on the CCA panel because he had been appointed to the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) by the Secretary of Defense. [read post]