Search for: "Matter of Nixon C." Results 121 - 140 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13]  The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14]  An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13]  The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14]  An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that the… [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At most, the Lewinsky evidence was modestly relevant in the Jones case: proof that Clinton had an affair with an intern has some bearing on whether Clinton is the sort of person who uses the power of his office for sexual gratification.If the Jones case arose today, questions like those proposed in Kavanaugh’s 1998 memo would be clearly disallowed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b), which limits discovery (including depositions) to matters that are both relevant to a claim or… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Margaret Taylor
Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that it had authority to resolve the conflict between President Richard Nixon and Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who had been appointed to investigate the Watergate affair, over the issue of executive privilege. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am by David Post
So what's the point of hearing additional evidence on the matter? [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:54 pm
(I don’t know what happened when Henry Kissinger received an award while he was still in the Nixon Administration.) [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
Federal prosecutions of former President Donald Trump must be done in a constitutional way no matter how much he is hated for his actions of January 6, 2021 or for any other reason. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Those who study the matter have a number of likely examples.So? [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
All of those who have been prosecuted for lying to Congress—e.g., Nixon’s former attorney general John Mitchell and former White House chief of staff H. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 9:01 am
  Indeed, the same Californians who gave all their electoral votes to a Democratic presidential candidate elected a Republican Governor; the context of an election matters. [read post]