Search for: "Matter of Rr."
Results 121 - 140
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
The court ruled that the case did not involve a matter of public concern and denied the anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
These are little descriptions or comments about their education matter and my involvement. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
RR Co., 99 U.S. 573, 576.Penal statutes must be construed narrowly and are interpreted against the state. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:00 pm
Record citations: Is a record citation like “4.RR.124-25″ one word or two or three or four? [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:00 pm
Record citations: Is a record citation like “4.RR.124-25″ one word or two or three or four? [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:08 am
While the case is interesting on its own, just for the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant(s), the matter at focus in this blog is one cause of action brought forth in the complaint -- Duty of Fiduciary Care (and as a subset, duty of loyalty). [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Think about that for a minute and why that type of system may have made sense 10 or 15 or however many years ago, but probably doesn’t make a lot of sense now when something like a news release can travel from Mountain View to Chicago (or wherever RR Donnelley processes these things) in a matter of seconds. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:51 am
LI RR in torts) and demonstrate how you can simplify the complex. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
rr … [et al.], (eds.). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
Burlington Northern RR. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
CONFOUNDING Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems faced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:46 pm
If the “characteristic in common” is the basis for an interaction with the exposure to S, then we would expect that to be shown by the data in the study; it would not, and should not, be a matter of conjecture or speculation. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Some expert witnesses adopted opinions as a matter of convenience and malleability, but most witnesses expressed sincerely held opinions. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:41 am
Your choice does matter. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:25 am
May RR get summary judgment? [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Professors Michael Green and Joseph Sanders are two of the longest serving interlocutors in the never-ending discussion and debate about the nature and limits of expert witness testimony on scientific questions about causation. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Consider an article by two would-be expert witnesses, who testify for plaintiffs, and confidently misstate the meaning of a confidence interval: “Thus, a RR [relative risk] of 1.8 with a confidence interval of 1.3 to 2.9 could very likely represent a true RR of greater than 2.0, and as high as 2.9 in 95 out of 100 repeated trials. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:42 pm
Thus, whether Simpson was a trespasser or a licensee would matter very much in Pennsylvania, even though it ultimately didn't matter in his home state. [read post]
