Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 121 - 140
of 30,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 3:45 pm
Supreme Court decided EEOC v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 1:55 pm
In this episode of The Workplace podcast, CalChamber Associate General Counsel Matthew Roberts and Employment Law Subject Matter Expert Vanessa Greene discuss three recent court cases that affect employers: Huerta v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:57 am
Over 80 years ago, in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”But “tradition” is a more complicated matter. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Open AI said that GPT-4 categorizes words into pronouns, nouns, verbs, and so on, and then uses math to predict the next word given the previous words. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed most of Assange’s legal arguments but said that unless “satisfactory” assurances were given by the US, he would be able to bring an appeal on three grounds. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
However, the district court found, as a factual matter, that this was not true. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:56 am
City of College Park v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am
Phillips also argued that the unilateral amendment right made the contract illusory, an argument that succeeded in the Harris v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:00 am
Ctr. for Autism, Inc. v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
If the Court were to adopt the view that this is not enough to render a lab report testimonial, then it would be a simple matter for labs always to avoid the rule of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
A related matter: Samuels said that Arizona law is clear in this situation that Rast’s statements are not admissible for the truth of what they assert. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:46 am
Second, the subject matter in the expression is itself inflammatory. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:49 am
” The Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
Therefore, it can be said the BSC rightfully rejected X’s argument since its assessment appears to be limited to the examination of whether the judgment, “as rendered [was] [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:09 pm
As a matter of corporate law, I assume so. [read post]
