Search for: "McCormack v McCormack" Results 121 - 140 of 295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 3:21 pm
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:04 am by Amy Howe
On March 4, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The other officials—most significantly Ellis, Griffith, Vought, Duffey, McCormack and Brechbuhl—declined to testify in a private deposition because the committee rules would have excluded counsel from their respective agency from attending (what I call the “deposition-counsel requirement”). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
Other White House officials who have also refused to testify include National Security Council lawyers John Eisenberg and Michael Ellis; Mulvaney adviser Robert Blair; and Brian McCormack, the associate director for natural resources, energy, and science at the Office of Management and Budget. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am by Dáire McCormack-George
Dáire McCormack-GeorgeThis post constitutes the latest in a series of blog posts reflecting on the skilled nature of work. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod maintains that Knick v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The website Coin Geek reports that Dr Craig Wright has filed Particulars of Claim in his libel claim against Peter McCormack. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
Dáire McCormack-GeorgeIntroduction Earlier this month, I presented a paper at the Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference at the University of Leeds, ‘On the Nature of Work and the Purpose of Labour Law’. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Dáire McCormack-George
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Maria Kendrick
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]