Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire"
Results 121 - 140
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 10:17 am
Standing Presently, under Kim v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm
Standing Presently, under Kim v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
Friedman, J.P., Catterson, McGuire, ... [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:21 am
Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Williams, McGuire, Kavanagh, ... [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 7:49 am
v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:46 am
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 2:25 am
.
People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
Terminating a teacher during his or her probationary periodZarinfar v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In Mensch v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:41 am
The case and the decision by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department in McGuire v McGuire is not as simple as it sounds. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:48 am
MAZZARELLI, J.P., SAXE, SULLIVAN, McGUIRE, ... [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
But petitioner’s argument comes a quarter of a century too late: this contention was decided adversely to him in McGuire v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:16 am
¶15 (quoting NACCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:13 pm
Hopkins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:37 am
Corp., 81 AD3d 622, 623-624 [2011]; see also Diller v Munzer, 141 AD3d 628, 629 [2016]; Loaiza v Lam, 107 AD3d 951, 953 [2013]). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
