Search for: "McMahon v. McMahon" Results 121 - 140 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was filed in this case on 12/23/19: McMahon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:17 am by David Lat
Legal and constitutional questions aside, I just think that guns are icky and scary and bad, and the world would be a better place if nobody had them.Given all my weird hang-ups about Asians and guns, I probably wouldn’t have made it on to the jury in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 57-page opinion this week in Marvel Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
“Less than a week before the 50th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
Specifically, Judge McMahon noted that the plaintiffs did not allege any “actual adverse effects” resulting from the removal of copyright information, as required by the US Supreme Court’s TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by David Lat
– Judge Colleen McMahon, granting a motion for conditional collective action certification in Shajan v. [read post]