Search for: "Meads v. Meads" Results 121 - 140 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 7:41 pm
Author ajay_suresh Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 2564 (Pat) (27 Sep 2021)This was one of a number of trials between Optis Cellular Technologies LLC, Cellular Wireless Technologies LLC and Unwired Planet International Limited ("Optis") of the one part and [read post]
 Meade J’s judgment (Neurim Pharmaceutical (1991) Limited and Anor v Generics (UK) Limited t/a Viatris and Anor [2022] EWHC 109 (Pat)), which can be found here, was handed down on 24 January 2022. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:09 am
 Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Promptu Systems Corporation v Sky UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 2021 (Pat) (19 July 2021)This was a claim for patent infringement by Promptu Systems Corporation ("Promptu") against Sky UK Ltd. and various related companies ("Sky") and a counterclaim by Sky for revocation. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Sophie Britton (Bristows)
 However this seems very unrealistic, and it looks as though we will find out soon either way following the decision in Optis v Apple[2] handed down by Mr Justice Meade last month. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
 However this seems very unrealistic, and it looks as though we will find out soon either way following the decision in Optis v Apple[2] handed down by Mr Justice Meade last month. [read post]