Search for: "Means v. Brooks" Results 121 - 140 of 897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
This Friday the New Hampshire Superior Court will hear oral argument in the latest Dartmouth College alumni case (Brooks v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm by Blue Blog
Cobb A Georgia Court of Appeals recently published its opinion in Board of Regents of the University system of Georgia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm by Blue Blog
Cobb A Georgia Court of Appeals recently published its opinion in Board of Regents of the University system of Georgia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:34 am
" Citing Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:26 pm
Following the Tribunal decision in Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Information Commissioner and Leapman, Brooke and Thomas (EA/2007/0060 etc; 26 February 2008) (upheld on appeal by the High Court1), we recommend that public authorities approach condition 6 as a three-part test:1. there must be a legitimate public interest in disclosure;2. the disclosure must be necessary to meet that public interest; and 3. the disclosure must not cause unwarranted harm to the interests… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The Supreme Court’s Greenhouse Gas Permitting Decision – What Does It Mean? [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:19 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Our predecessor court articulated the “life, meaning, and vitality” standard in Kropa v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
Brooks possessed the metadata and would willingly `give it to the court for in camera review’ and `explain to the court exactly what it means. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
George Brooks, No. 102,452 (Shawnee)Direct appeal (petition for review); RapeLydia KrebsInsufficient evidence of rapeInsufficient evidence of breach of privacyState v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
It is, as a matter of public law, not open to public body to simply ignore policies or Government guidance – R (Rixon) v LB Islington (1998)   1 CCLR 340 – indeed, they have “special importance where the behaviour of the tenant’s children is at the root of much of the trouble” – per Brooke LJ in Moat Housing Group v Hartless [2005] EWCA Civ 287, at [102]) (c) The Judge had used the possession order as… [read post]