Search for: "Michael Erwin"
Results 121 - 140
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
Erwin attempted to stop, sliding into the front of Murphy's car, and he was ejected. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 5:59 am
" Michael Stokes Paulsen, University of St. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
” UPI’s Michael Kirkland previews next Term’s Chaidez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm
If you are going to be there, put the following on your calendar: Friday January 4 2:00-5:00 Presidential Program, “Assessing the Future of International Criminal Justice: from Nuremberg to the ICC” (Rosedown, 3rd Floor, Hilton) Saturday January 5 7:00-8:30 Section on Constitutional Law – Breakfast session on presidential power in the Bush and Obama administration, featuring Professors Michael McConnell and Rick Pildes (Grand Salon 3&6, First Floor,… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:02 pm
But more intriguing than the big signs is a little clause that seems like it could solve the mystery of why Chancellor Michael Drake fired liberal legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky just days after hiring him as the new dean. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
Bolliger, Michael J. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:42 am
And Judge Ray Kethledge—a lecturer on federal practice at the University of Michigan—cast a broader net in 2017 with a popular book drawing on history and social science: Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude, coauthored with Michael Erwin. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:38 am
Burwell and the Chevron At casetext, Michael Foreman describes the Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
Gould, Chief Executive to Chief Justice: Taft betwixt the White House and Supreme Court Michael Greve, Thomas Hazlett & Todd J. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 6:15 am
Kennedy, Michael R. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:41 pm
To consider these and other issues raised by Hellman’s rigorous and illuminating paper, we’ve invited an all-star cast of legal thinkers: Erwin Chemerinsky Louis Michael Seidman Lawrence Solum Zephyr Teachout Some of our regular crew of perma-bloggers & guests will likely have some contributions, as well. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:21 pm
Tomorrow I hear Erwin Chemerinsky of the Duke Law School. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:30 am
” In podcasts for UCI Law, Erwin Chemerinsky previews the upcoming Term, while Rick Hasen previews Evenwel v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:27 pm
Marshall Probing the Effects of Judicial Specialization Lawrence Baum A Response to Professors George and Guthrie, Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts' of Appeals Image Michael Boudin A Response to Professor Ramseyer, Predicting Court Outcomes through Political Preferences Michael Boudin No Warrant for Radical Change: A Response to Professors George and Guthrie Erwin Chemerinsky Do Judges Think? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Simmons, Michael Sink, John Skenyon, Ronald Smith, Eric Sophir, Robert Stanley, Henry Su, Blair Taylor, Bryan Vogel, Keith Vogt, Daniel Volchok, Steven Warner, Scott C. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am
Commentary on the Senate’s constitutional responsibility regarding hearings more generally comes from Erwin Chemerinsky and Michael Ramsey in a podcast for the National Constitution Center. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:19 am
The other lectures available free online are by: The Rt Hon Lord Denning; Richard O’Sullivan; Professor F H Lawson; Professor A L Goodhart; Sir Carleton Kemp Allen; Professor C J Hamson; Professor Glanville Williams; The Rt Hon Lord Devlin; The Rt Hon Lord MacDermott; Professor Sir David Hughes Parry; C H S Fifoot; M C Setalvad; Professor Sir Thomas Smith; The Rt Hon Sir Robert Megarry; The Baroness Wootton of Abinger; Dean Erwin N Griswold; The Rt Hon Lord Tanley; The… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman have the story for the New York Times. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Erwin, 902 F.2d 510 (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. [read post]
