Search for: "Motivation Design, LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
The courts have generally noted that, although the COVID-19 shutdown orders were issued by a civil authority, those shutdown orders were motivated by the pandemic, meaning that the plaintiff’s loss of income was at least indirectly caused by a virus for which coverage was otherwise excluded. [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm by Emily Dai
Alvarez, managing principal at BridgeCounsel Strategies LLC. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am by Cinthia Macie
  The court found that “Apple has provided no evidence that the rate it charges bears any quantifiable relation to the services provided,” 30% was “incredibly profitable,” and “there appear[] to be no market forces to . . . motivate change. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” But a profit motive didn’t distinguish First Databank from a newspaper. [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:14 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Robert Holleyman, president and CEO at Crowing & Moring International LLC; Amb. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
And even aside from the actual motivation for this legislation, it is plainly content-based and subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Arguing that this holding directly conflicts with the Supreme Court’s rulings in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Arguing that this holding directly conflicts with the Supreme Court’s rulings in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]