Search for: "Muse v. Muse" Results 121 - 140 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
Frank Cranmer Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Saturday musings: employees, workers, office holders and religion" in Law & Religion UK, 21 May 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/05/21/saturday-musings-employees-workers-office-holders-and-religion/ [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:56 pm by John Floyd
From the comfort of a courtroom or chambers, it is often possible for judges to muse on how an officer could have handled a situation better. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Musing on the continued validity of Worcester, the chief justice invoked Justice Felix Frankfurter, who suggested in Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:54 am by Christopher G. Hill
  A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
They mused in particular about whether its intent element, “corruptly,” might be too vague and whether there was any “limiting principle” that would keep the provision from being applied too broadly. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
This offers an opportunity to revive and underrated William Brennan First Amendment opinion--Board of Island Trees v. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia federal court, McCarthy Building Companies Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
 Anyway, here's what Luttig wrote: I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]