Search for: "NIXON v. ROBERTS"
Results 121 - 140
of 429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
“Before Virus Outbreak, a Cascade of Warnings Went Unheeded,” declared the New York Times headline. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Circuit decided Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
Nixon and the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson to conclude that Chief Justice John Roberts’ role in presiding over the trial of President Donald Trump will likely wrap up this week without fanfare or hurdles for the chief justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Tipsy on the bench. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer continues to call for the testimony of four witnesses—former National Security Adviser John Bolton; current acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney; Mulvaney’s chief deputy Robert Blair; and Michael Duffey, associate director of national security programs at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
Shortly before the New Year, a New York Times story based on newly reported emails and communications suggested that the officials who know the most about the withheld aid to Ukraine—former National Security Adviser John Bolton; Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney; Office of Management and Budget officials Robert Blair, Michael Duffey and Russell Vought; and White House lawyers—are the same officials who, at President Trump’s direction, have refused to testify… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
Nixon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
In this case, the line was bright and the decision was simple.Cox (and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force)Next in the statutory line of “succession” to exercise the Attorney General’s functions was the Solicitor General, Robert Bork, on leave from teaching at Yale Law School. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
[Walter Nixon v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Trump v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
Nixon, the Mazars subpoena must be enjoined despite seeking no privileged information and bearing no relation to the President’s performance of his official functions,” Chief Judge Robert Katzmann wrote. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
The Senate has the sole power to conduct the trial, which is non-justiciable according to the SCOTUS decision in Nixon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
Although the Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
