Search for: "NORTHERN STATES POWER CO V US"
Results 121 - 140
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.] [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
TheBelt and Road Initiative was a masterstroke of branding, persuading state after state in theMiddle East that it could play a central role in the geostrategic calculations of the world’sgreatest rising power, with each imagining the growing power it would accrue as a result. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
American Electric Power Co., 582 F.3d 309, 2009.) 8 DePaul Bus. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Powers, 454 F.2d 1362, 1366 (1st Cir. 1972). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Minnesota is one of only a handful of states with third degree murder on the books. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
Co. [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm
And now, the other news of note from the past week: In the latest episode of the Mac Power Users podcast, California attorney David Sparks and his co-host Stephen Hackett discuss apps that you can use to be productive with an iPhone. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Northern States Power Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Duphily, 703 A.2d 1202, 1209 (Del. 1997); Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:55 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 501 U.S. 868, 878–79 (1991); Glidden Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and the Federal Insurance Co. et. al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Nelson, the court declined to adjudicate abuses of power by the Saudi police under the FSIA, deeming the police conduct a “foreign state’s exercise” of a “peculiarly sovereign” power. [read post]
