Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 121 - 140 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Rick Hills
Neil Siegel has an interesting post at Balkinization against reading Congress' powers more narrowly when Congress invades so-called "areas of traditional state concern. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
Cooter (UC-Berkeley) & Neil Siegel (Duke), Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power, 98 Va. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
Selvin Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School, and Neil Siegel, Professor of Law and Political Science at Duke Law School. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted Distinguishing the 'Truly National' from the 'Truly Local': Customary Allocation, Commercial Activity, and Collective Action on SSRN. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm by vm40@duke.edu
“Arguments by liberal scholars who care about constitutional text and history, such as Neil Siegel of Duke Law School, were reflected in Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion about the taxing power,” wrote Jeffrey Rosen in The New Republic. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
[Generally cleaned up text and added an update] [UPDATE:  From the abstract it looks like Neil Siegel and Bob Cooter anticipated Chief Justice Roberts approach in their paper, Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power and may even have provided him with the road map for his analysis. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
.”  At Balkinization, Neil Siegel calls for clear confidentiality rules for clerks. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am by Marc DeGirolami
SECOND ADDENDUM: Neil Siegel has something on this as well (referring in his post to a forthcoming Va. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:05 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Co-blogger Jonathan Adler points out several weaknesses in the collective action theory approach to interpreting constitutional federalism advocated by a number of academics, most notably Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” The case for a “collective action federalism” of this sort has been made at greater length by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review, and by Professor Siegel on these pages. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Bagenstos
 Neil Siegel and others have offered arguments for upholding the mandate based on constitutional structure. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:35 pm by Guest Blogger
For one thing, the Court could easily also set out some limiting principles on the taxing power, along the lines sketched nicely by Bob Cooter and Neil Siegel, that would be fully consistent with § 5000A. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:52 pm by Lawrence Solum
Purdy and Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law and Duke University - School of Law) have posted The Liberty of Free Riders: The Minimum Coverage Provision, Mill’s 'Harm Principle,' and American Social Morality (American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 38, Nos. 2&3, p. 374, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted Foreword, the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act: Ideas from the Academy (Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:37 am by Lawrence Solum
Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) has posted Jack Balkin's Rich Historicism and Diet Originalism: Health Benefits and Risks for the Constitutional System (Michigan Law Review, Vol. 111, 2013) on SSRN. [read post]