Search for: "Nixon v. Fine"
Results 121 - 140
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm
John Adams's famous aspiration is not our reality: We live in a government of men, as well as laws. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
In particular, we were skeptical that Trump’s speech would satisfy the stringent requirement of Brandenburg v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:27 am
Nixon won both Florida and Ohio in 1960 but lost the election.] [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Just a few sentences is just fine and dandy. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Return on investment arguments may eventually be fine-grained and precise enough to justify spending government money on civil justice INSTEAD of spending it on something else. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
’” There’s only one problem with Trump’s eligibility for the office he now holds: The idea of Trump’s swearing this or any other oath “solemnly” is, not to put too fine a point on it, laughable—as more fundamentally is any promise on his part to “faithfully” execute this or any other commitment that involves the centrality of anyone or anything other than himself. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Nixon was the great advocate for legal services. 10:47 Changes in legal services could help. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Nixon, or anything like that. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:23 am
In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Mojo Nixon - "Destroy All Lawyers" (There's a plague on the planet, and they went to law school. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
