Search for: "North Dakota v. Minnesota"
Results 121 - 140
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2007, 6:55 pm
Moe Gibbs, the 2007 scheduled North Dakota murder trial of a "former jailer" accused of killing a college student. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
April 28, 1987).North Carolina: Baraukas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litig., Nos. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:49 am
North Dakota Ohio 70 70/None Constitution: Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
The 9 states using the ‘49 percent’ form: Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, North Dakota, Utah and West Virginia. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
Three years ago, in Daimler AG v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:43 am
North Dakota. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:43 am
North Dakota. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
For example, 13 states (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina and South Dakota) require authorization—often by voter signature—to collect and drop off ballots on behalf of the voter. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
North Dakota, 136 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
North Dakota, 136 S. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Vermont permit recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to interpretations of statutory language such as ‘pecuniary loss,’ ‘general loss,’ and ‘fair and just. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:49 pm
But a recent case decided by the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota employers) highlights that certain stereotypes about older workers may persist. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Whitt v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Feb. 2, 2010) (affirming dismissal of distributor of OTC drug under Minnesota statute); Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
The case was then remanded to the trial court for further consideration.The relevant discussion is as follows:"¶22 The North Dakota Supreme Court in Carlson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
" The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:42 am
Driving under the influence ranged from a low of 9.5 percent in Utah, to highs of 26.4 percent in Wisconsin, 24.9 percent in North Dakota and 23.5 percent in Minnesota. [read post]
