Search for: "Officer Paulsen" Results 121 - 140 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2021, 5:25 pm by Ilya Somin
Whether or not he violated a specific valid law (Johnson's defenders claimed the Tenure of Office Act was unconstitutional, a view eventually backed by the Supreme Court in 1926), Johnson had grossly abused his powers and richly deserved to be removed from office (for good discussions of the reasons why impeachment for technically legal abuses of power is permissible, see analyses by  Keith Whittington  and prominent conservative legal scholar Michael Stokes… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:13 pm by Ilya Somin
If Trump is convicted, I hope the Senate will not only remove him from office, but impose the additional penalty, provided for in the Constitution, of "disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Five years later, a record number of trans and nonbinary candidates are vying for public office. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm by Elizabeth Wydra
  The Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress the power “[t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:36 am by Andrew Kent
Governors of American colonies pre-independence, post-independence state governors, executive officers under the Articles of Confederation government and other executives—such as mayors and governors of corporations—were required, before entering office, to take an oath for the due or faithful execution of their office. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
Then-Professor Stephen Breyer, in his Nov. 28, 1973 letter to Senator Robert Byrd, conceded that he was not offering "an expert opinion" and had "not researched the question" but, with that proviso, nonetheless opined that any pay raise enacted for a given office by Congress would automatically signal an augmentation of the status and prestige attached to the office in question -- an augmentation that undoing the pay raise could not negate, given the odds that a… [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:10 am by Seán Binder
  Former President Trump is ineligible to be president because the Constitution bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office, conservative professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen concluded in an article. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm by Steve Sady
Through the diligent advocacy of Joyce Leavitt and Robin Packel of the Oakland federal defender office, the opinion was amended. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Before resigning in December 1860, Floyd used his office as secretary of war to scatter union forces and divert munitions away from key Northern forts, thus fortifying the South. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:54 pm by Stephen Griffin
  He listed Andrew Johnson’s violation of the Tenure of Office Act as “[t]he patriarch of cases of defiance. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Baude and Paulsen have pivoted, and suggest that Congress may indeed be a "backstop" on January 6, 2025. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:03 am by Ilya Somin
The Impeachment Clause establishes a single  standard for removal for the "President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If it takes action by a super-majority of Congress to enable an insurrectionist to hold office, then the default constitutional setting prior to Congressional action is ineligibility. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
  Under Baude and Paulsen's view, Section 3 would already have automatically barred such individuals from office. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
One brief was written by Walter Dellinger, former acting solicitor general, emeritus Duke University Law professor and a partner in the Washington office of O’Melveny & Myers. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:37 pm
" In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1480 (Fed. [read post]